Home Page
Click Here
LEGAL NEWS

How is the bar spending your money?

ImageThe State Bar of Wisconsin is heading into the end of its 2009 fiscal year with a $50,000 budget deficit – and some bar members want more information on how their money is being spent.

Several members of the Board of Governors, including President-elect Douglas W. Kammer, say they are entitled to more detail on costs for personnel, health care and overhead, which combined are the largest annual expenditures for the organization.

“I’d hate like hell to face my constituents and find out the janitors working for this organization are paid more than the people we’re asking to pay dues,” Kammer said.

At a June 26 meeting, the board approved the 2010 budget, which allots $6.2 million (of a total of $11.8 million) for “personnel and related overhead.”

Kammer, who began his term as president on July 1, was one of a handful of board members who voted against the budget, saying it was not appropriate to vote for a budget “when we don’t know what the big numbers are.”

Kammer said that he has asked for a salary breakdown for the bar’s 94 full-time employees, but has been unable to obtain that information.

He said members would benefit from more transparency, noting that the board “has the ultimate responsibility for running this company.”

Objections Raised

But outgoing Finance Committee Chairman William J. Domina said that his understanding of current bar policies does not allow for an officer to individually review employee salaries. (The committee handles bar policy related to personnel salaries.)

“Frankly, if the president wants to see those numbers, he should bring forth a policy to this bar for discussion and debate,” Domina said.

He noted that health insurance costs jumped about 6 percent for the 2010 budget and employees traditionally get a “3 to 5 percent” annual raise.

Some board members agree the salaries should not be disclosed. Gov. Margaret Wrenn Hickey said that in her experience, the disclosure of staff salaries is unusual and “demoralizing.”

“I worry very much that this would become public information, which I believe would cause us to lose very key staff members,” she said.

But Kammer said that he has been unable to find provisions in the bar’s bylaws, which prohibit him from getting information on staff salaries.

Appalling Situation?

Several board members, including Gov. Wayne A. Arnold, suggested that bar members would be “appalled” if they knew that the president was denied the details about the organization’s largest expenditures without explanation.

Others, like Gov. Jessica J. Tlusty, said that it was important from a business perspective to obtain a better understanding of how the bar spends members’ money.

She noted that small and solo practitioners know exactly how much their firms are spending on overhead, health insurance and employee raises.

Gov. Jeffrey R. Zirgibel suggested that bar leaders need to take a more active role in evaluating expenses, noting that personnel and overhead costs have risen by more than $1 million during the last four years.

“It’s a bad economy and the board should have a say in what’s going up and what’s not going up,” Zirgibel said. “We’ve got to be responsible for these things.”

3 Comments on This Article

1
The title of this piece is misleading and inflammatory. Many staffers at the Bar work in revenue producing endeavours that more than pay for their salaries and overhead. Mentioning the total personnel and overhead without making note of the fact that dues does not pay all of those costs is either misinformed or intentionally deceitful.
Comment By  Anonymous
Thursday, July 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM
2
Whoever (one of the 94 staffers?) prepared the Bar's own report of the meeting thought it sufficient to say "The board approved the State Bar’s $11.8 million budget for FY 2010."
Comment By  Terrence Berres
Wednesday, July 1, 2009 at 10:36 AM
3
As a public employee, my salary is a matter of public record - as it should be. The taxpayers have a right to know how much they are paying their employees. As dues paying members of the bar, we have an equivalent right to know how much our employees are being paid. The explanations for withholding this information do not hold water.
Comment By  Robert Jambois
Wednesday, July 1, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Leave A Comment




Please type in the text from the above image:

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets".

ABOUT US     MANAGE MY ACCOUNT     SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT     PRIVACY POLICY     SUBSCRIBE     ADVERTISE     CONTACT US