By: Derek Hawkins//January 2, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: Curtis L. Lovelien, et al. v. Austin Mutual Insurance Company
Case No.: 2016AP1679
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.
Focus: Insurance – Direct Action Violation
Curtis Lovelien and Timothy Kroening (collectively, Lovelien) appeal an order dismissing Austin Mutual Insurance Company and the other claimants from this personal injury action after Austin Mutual settled with some of the claimants and forwarded its remaining policy limits to the circuit court for allocation between Curtis Lovelien and Timothy Kroening. Lovelien argues Austin Mutual’s payment of the remaining policy limits after the partial settlement violates Wisconsin’s direct action statute, WIS. STAT. § 632.24 (2015-16), because the funds were not distributed on a pro rata basis according to the damages each claimant sustained. Austin Mutual contends this appeal is moot based upon a claimed accord and satisfaction between Austin Mutual and Lovelien.
We conclude Austin Mutual’s payment of its remaining policy limits to the circuit court does not constitute an accord and satisfaction between Austin Mutual and Lovelien and, therefore, this appeal is not moot. We also conclude the direct action statute does not require distribution of an insurer’s funds to claimants on a pro rata basis. We therefore affirm the circuit court’s order of dismissal.
Recommended for Publication