Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Inadmissible Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 20, 2017//

Inadmissible Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 20, 2017//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District IV

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Jamie M. Srb

Case No.: 2017AP307-CR

Officials: SHERMAN, J.

Focus: Inadmissible Evidence

Jamie Srb appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1). Srb contends the circuit court erred in concluding that the results from Srb’s blood alcohol concentration test were admissible at trial. Srb argues that the test results were not admissible because the test was not administered within three hours of driving and because expert testimony establishing the probative value of the test results was not admissible. For reasons explained below, I affirm.

Full Text


Attorney Derek A. Hawkins is the managing partner at Hawkins Law Offices LLC, where he heads up the firm’s startup law practice. He specializes in business formation, corporate governance, intellectual property protection, private equity and venture capital funding and mergers & acquisitions. Check out the website at www.hawkins-lawoffices.com or contact them at 262-737-8825.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests