By: Derek Hawkins//October 26, 2017//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin, et al.
Case No.: 2016AP869
Officials: Lundsten, P.J., Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ.
Focus: Statutory Interpretation
Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) appeals a judgment of the circuit court dismissing ALDF’s action for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin and Richard R. Lane, records custodian for the University of Wisconsin’s Research Animal Resource Center (collectively, the Board of Regents), to grant ALDF access to documents withheld following an open records request by ALDF, and a declaratory judgment. The documents at issue were created by employees of the University of Wisconsin’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Animal Care and Use Committee) during a meeting of that committee. The court determined that the documents are not “record[s]” for purposes of Wisconsin’s public records law, WIS. STAT. §§ 19.31 through 19.39 (2015-16), because they are “notes … prepared for the originator’s personal use,” and granted summary judgment in favor of the Board of Regents. We conclude that the documents are not excepted from the definition of “record[s]” under WIS. STAT. § 19.32(2) and, therefore, reverse.