By: Derek Hawkins//July 25, 2017//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Eric J. Hodkiewicz
Case No.: 2016AP359
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ
Focus: Plain Error and Newly Discovered Evidence
Eric Hodkiewicz was convicted of nine offenses, based on allegations that he harassed and physically assaulted his now-ex-wife, S.P., during the course of their acrimonious divorce and child custody dispute. On appeal, Hodkiewicz argues he is entitled to a new trial based on plain error, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and newly discovered evidence. In the alternative, he seeks a new trial in the interest of justice. Finally, Hodkiewicz claims his convictions and consecutive sentences for both bail jumping and the underlying offense (strangulation and suffocation) violated his right to be free from double jeopardy.
We reject each of Hodkiewicz’s appellate arguments, with one exception. We agree that Hodkiewicz’s trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to an officer’s testimony that S.P. told him she received a particular telephone call “on her work phone.” We therefore reverse Hodkiewicz’s convictions on Counts 2 and 3 and the related portions of the order denying Hodkiewicz’s motion for postconviction relief, and we remand for further proceedings on those counts. In all other respects, we affirm Hodkiewicz’s judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief.