By: Derek Hawkins//July 12, 2017//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Rafi Sayyed
Case No.: 16-2858
Officials: BAUER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and DEGUILIO, District Judge
Focus: Court Error – Garnishment Order
Rafi Sayyed was ordered to pay $940,000 in mandatory restitution to the American Hospital Association after pleading guilty to mail fraud. The United States sought to collect part of the restitution with approximately $327,000 contained in Sayyed’s retirement accounts. The district court granted the government’s motion for turnover orders. On appeal, Sayyed maintains that the district court erred in failing to find that his retirement funds qualify as “earnings” subject to the 25% garnishment cap under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. We disagree. Because the garnishment cap only protects periodic distributions pursuant to a retirement program and the government may reach Sayyed’s present interest in his retirement funds, the district court properly granted the government’s turnover motion.
Affirmed