By: Derek Hawkins//July 6, 2017//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Joseph Lombardo v. United States of America
Case No.: 15-2860
Officials: BAUER and POSNER, Circuit Judges, and DEGUILIO, District Judge
Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Joseph Lombardo is serving a life sentence on his convictions for racketeering, murder, and obstruction of justice. After we affirmed his convictions and sentence on direct appeal, he retained a new attorney to argue that his convictions were the product of his trial counsel’s in- effectiveness. However, his new attorney misunderstood when the one-year limitations period for motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 began running, and thus filed Lombardo’s motion too late.
The question in this appeal is whether an attorney’s miscalculation of a statute of limitations justifies equitably tolling the limitations period for a motion under § 2255. Following longstanding precedent, we hold that it does not, even if the result is to bar a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Lombardo’s untimely motion.
Affirmed