Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Duty of Consistency – Tax

By: Derek Hawkins//May 2, 2017//

Duty of Consistency – Tax

By: Derek Hawkins//May 2, 2017//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Alaa I. Musa v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case No.: 16-1841

Officials: BAUER, SYKES, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Duty of Consistency – Tax

The central issue in this appeal from the Tax Court is how to apply the “duty of consistency,” an equitable tax doctrine analogous to judicial estoppel, which prevents a party from prevailing in a court proceeding by taking one position and then taking a contradictory position in a later case. See Kielmar v. Commissioner, 884 F.2d 959, 965 (7th Cir. 1989). The Tax Court correctly applied the duty of consistency in this case to prevent a taxpayer’s unfair tactic to minimize the consequences of his fraud.

Affirmed

Full Text


Attorney Derek A. Hawkins is the managing partner at Hawkins Law Offices LLC, where he heads up the firm’s startup law practice. He specializes in business formation, corporate governance, intellectual property protection, private equity and venture capital funding and mergers & acquisitions. Check out the website at www.hawkins-lawoffices.com or contact them at 262-737-8825.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests