By: Derek Hawkins//September 6, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Pine Top Receivables of Illinois, LLC v. Transfercom, Ltd
Case No.: 16-1073
Officials: EASTERBROOK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges and YANDLE, District Judge.∗
Focus: Contractual Interpretation
“Service of suit” clause in contract unambiguously allows to select forum for litigating.
“Read as a whole, the reinsurance agreement requires Transfercom to submit to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction chosen by PTRIL, whether it be to determine the arbitrable nature of the dispute, to confirm an arbitration award, to compel arbitration, or to resolve on the merits, a claim not subject to arbitration—including PTRIL’s breach of contract claim. See e.g., Travelers Ins. Co. v. Keeling, 996 F.2d 1485, 1490 (2d Cir. 1993); Century Indem. Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, subscribing to Retrocessional Agreement Nos. 950548, 950549, 950646, 584 F.3d 513, 554 (3d Cir. 2009) (service of suit clauses compliment rather than negate accompanying arbitration clauses).”
Affirmed