By: Derek Hawkins//August 29, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Jimmie Darrell Poe, Sr. v. Leann LaRiva
Case No.: 14-3513
Officials: EASTERBROOK, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Challenge to Conviction
Appellant petitions for writ of habeas corpus under wrong statute.
“On a final note, Poe makes various attempts to improperly shoehorn his Richardson claim into his § 2241 petition, which relied on Alleyne. His argument essentially runs as follows: Richardson has been applied retroactively, and because there exists a “nexus” between Alleyne and Richardson, Richardson’s retroactivity should allow Poe’s Alleyne claims to proceed un‐ der § 2241. (Appellant Br. 13–14.) Poe’s argument makes no sense. In asserting such a “nexus,” it appears that Poe is trying combine Richardson’s retroactivity and statutory interpreta‐ tion with Alleyne’s recent timing to fulfill the requirements for § 2241. A petitioner may not “cherry‐pick” aspects of legally unrelated Supreme Court cases in order to overcome AEDPA’s procedural requirements. Therefore, we reject Poe’s attempts.”
Affirmed