By: Derek Hawkins//August 22, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Duane L. O’Malley
Case No.: 14-2711
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and ROVNER, Circuit Judges
Focus: New Trial
Appellant motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence improperly denied as immaterial.
“Here the district court held that O’Malley “is seeking relief that he can only obtain through § 2255,” relying on our decisions in United States v. Evans, 224 F.3d 670 (7th Cir. 2000), Ruth v. United States, 266 F.3d 658 (7th Cir. 2001), and United States v. Rollins, 607 F.3d 500 (7th Cir. 2010), for the proposition that Rule 33 does not authorize a postjudgment motion based on newly discovered evidence except when that evidence implies the defendant’s actual innocence and came to light after trial in a manner not suggesting a constitutional violation. That reliance is mistaken. Those decisions, which analyze some of the interplay between Rule 33 and § 2255, do not purport to define the outer limits of claims that can be brought under Rule 33.”
Vacated