By: Derek Hawkins//July 20, 2016//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Clayton M. Miller
Case No.: 2015AP2074
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ
Focus: Court Error – Sentence Modification
Clayton Miller, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Miller argues: (1) the circuit court relied on inaccurate information when sentencing him; (2) fifteen new factors warrant sentence modification; (3) four conditions of his extended supervision are
unconstitutional; (4) the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion with respect to the conditions of extended supervision; and (5) the circuit court was obligated to grant his sentence modification motion because the State did not oppose it. We reject Miller’s arguments and affirm