By: Derek Hawkins//July 11, 2016//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: Water Well Solutions Services Group, Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance Company
Case No.: 2014AP2484
Focus: Insurance Coverage
Insurance provider did not breach its duty of defend. Court will not craft exception to four-corners rule
“We recognized this in Doyle when we soundly rejected an assertion, based on Berg, suggesting a court should look beyond the four corners of the complaint to determine whether an insurer had breached its duty to defend. Doyle, 219 Wis. 2d at 284 n.3. A year later, citing our footnote in Doyle, we again declined to recognize an exception to the four-corners duty to defend rule. Smith v. Katz, 226 Wis. 2d 798, 815-16, 595 N.W.2d 345 (1999).
Affirmed
Concurring:
Dissenting: BRADLEY, A. W., J. and ABRAHAMSON, J. dissent (Opinion filed).