By: Derek Hawkins//May 31, 2016//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Daniel D. Utecht
Case No.: 2015AP886; 2014AP887
Officials: Kloppenburg, P.J., Lundsten and Blanchard, JJ.
Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Daniel Utecht appeals two judgments of conviction for child sexual assault, following a jury trial in these consolidated cases: one count of repeated first degree sexual assault of L.J.H., and one count of repeated first degree sexual assault of T.C.H. Utecht also appeals the order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14) postconviction motion for relief. Utecht argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective by: (1) failing to object to or limit the admission of evidence of a previous “domestic incident” involving Utecht; (2) failing to cross examine L.J.H. about whether she had lied to police about that “domestic incident;” (3) failing to elicit evidence that Utecht had offered to take a polygraph test; and (4) telling Utecht that they would not ask him any questions if he testified. We conclude that Utecht’s trial attorneys were not ineffective, and, therefore, we affirm.