By: Derek Hawkins//May 16, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Craig J. Kunkel et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Case No.: 15-2232
Officials: EASTERBROOK and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PEPPER, District Judge.*
Focus: IRS Tax Assessment – Abuse of Discretion
IRS error does not overcome implementation of 20% penalty to taxpayer
“The Tax Court thought reform of the waivers appropriate because only the 2008 tax year had periods of limitations expiring in spring 2012. The forms could not have served any purpose other than extending the time to file assessments for 2008—and you can’t beat something with nothing. Taxpayers’ brief speculates that Bastian thought that he was playing a practical joke on the IRS by signing without alerting it to the scrivener’s error. This seems unlikely; the adverse effect on Bastian’s professional reputation could have been substantial. If the IRS came to conclude that Bastian had tried to hoodwink it, he might find his credentials as a tax representative pulled. The best way to understand what happened is the way the Tax Court did: A typist misread the file, entering the dates on which limitations periods would expire rather than the dates on which the tax years ended, and then everyone else missed that error. We see no clear error or abuse of discretion in that conclusion.”
Affirmed