By: Derek Hawkins//April 18, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Terrance Flynn v. Marion Thatcher et al
Case No.: 15-2458
Officials: FLAUM, RIPPLE, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Equal Protection
Prisoner claim for being denied equal protection due to not receiving same privileges are inmates in the “honor program” dismissed on failure to state a claim grounds.
“There are obvious reasons to extend preferential treatment to inmates in the Honor Program. Conferring benefits to those with a history of good behavior encourages rehabilitation, institutional security, and the safety of inmates, staff, and visitors. See McGinnis v. Royster, 410 U.S. 263, 270–73 (1973); Singer v. Raemisch, 593 F.3d 529, 535 (7th Cir. 2010); Harbin-Bey v. Rutter, 420 F.3d 571, 576 (6th Cir. 2005); Woodson v. Attorney Gen., 990 F.2d 1344, 1349–50 (D.C. Cir 1993). Even Flynn concedes in his appellate brief that the program “rewards” prisoners “for good behavior.” He argues, however, that there can be no valid reason to deny him the same privileges because he has demonstrated the same good behavior and meets all of the criteria for admission. But there are many rational reasons for requiring an application to evaluate the prisoner before awarding benefits. See McGinnis, 410 U.S. at 272–73.”
Affirmed