By: Derek Hawkins//April 11, 2016//
7TH Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Adam Brent Hill
Case No.: 15-3090
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and ROVNER, Circuit Judges
Focus: Waiver
Defendant not given opportunity to properly waive objections at sentencing
“So, to conclude, if the limited remand that we’re ordering results in a determination that the defendant knowingly waived all challenges to the conditions of supervised release, we will grant the Anders motion and that will be the end of the case. If instead the determination is that he did not knowingly waive all challenges to the conditions, the case will again come before us and he will need to decide (and through his counsel advise us of the decision) whether or not to challenge the conditions, since a successful challenge, followed by a remand for resentencing, will leave the judge free to impose a longer, as well as in the alternative a shorter, prison sentence. For now, however, we need only remand the case for a determination of whether the defendant knowingly waived all objections to the conditions of supervised release imposed by the district court. The defendant’s lawyer shall continue to represent the defendant on remand, and is ordered to file a status report with this court within 14 days of the district court’s ruling on remand.”
Remanded with Directions