By: Derek Hawkins//January 27, 2016//
7TH Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Fidlar Technologies v. LPS Real Estate Data Solutions
Case No.: 15-1830
Officials: FLAUM, MANION, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Practice Area: Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Company download of county land records was not fraudulent
“None of the circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of LPS employees, the agreements governing LPS’s access to county records, and the Laredo technology itself, undermines LPS’s claim that it believed it could permissibly download records through its web-harvester without paying print fees. First, LPS presented testimony from its employees indicating that they believed that although printing a record resulted in a fee, downloading a record did not. For example, LPS’s former Senior Vice President Erick Marroquin stated that he believed that LPS was “entitled to download images from the Laredo program without incurring a print charge.” LPS also offered evidence that it did not use a webharvester to avoid print fees. The employee who oversaw development of the web-harvester, John McCabe, testified that in designing the web-harvester, “no part of [the process] was to avoid a print fee” and that the purpose was “[e]fficiency, speed.””
Affirmed