Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

OWI – Blood Draw – Suppression of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 18, 2015//

OWI – Blood Draw – Suppression of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 18, 2015//

Listen to this article

Criminal

WI Court of Appeals – District IV

Officials: SHERMAN, J.

OWI – Blood Draw – Suppression of Evidence

2015AP656-CR State of Wisconsin v. Patrick K. Kozel

Patrick K. Kozel appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), second offense. Kozel contends the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the blood draw evidence. He argues that the blood draw evidence was inadmissible because the State failed to prove that the blood draw was conducted by a “person acting under the direction of a physician,” as required by WIS. STAT. § 343.305(5)(b), and because the method and manner of the blood draw were not constitutionally reasonable. I agree with Kozel that the evidence presented at the suppression hearing failed to establish that Kozel’s blood draw was conducted by a “person acting under the direction of a physician.” Accordingly, I reverse the judgment of conviction and remand for the circuit court to suppress the blood draw.

Reversed and Remanded

Full Text


Attorney Derek A. Hawkins is the managing partner at Hawkins Law Offices LLC, where he heads up the firm’s startup law practice. He specializes in business formation, corporate governance, intellectual property protection, private equity and venture capital funding and mergers & acquisitions. Check out the website at www.hawkins-lawoffices.com or contact them at 262-737-8825.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests