By: Derek Hawkins//October 6, 2015//
Civil
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz, J., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge.
Paternity Petition
2014AP2656 Douglas L. V. Arika B.
Douglas L. appeals an order dismissing, without prejudice, his petition to determine paternity. Douglas argues the circuit court erroneously concluded that a paternity determination was not in the best interest of the child. Arika B. cross-appeals, arguing the petition should have been dismissed with prejudice. We reject Arika’s argument and conclude the circuit court was authorized to dismiss the petition without prejudice. However, the court set forth no factual findings underlying its decision. Because the WIS. STAT. § 767.863(1m) best-interest-of-the-child determination is subject to de novo review, we are unable to address Douglas’s argument. Accordingly, we affirm in part; reverse in part, and remand with directions to make detailed factual findings.
Decision
Affirmed in part, Reversed in Part. Recommended for Publication.