By: Derek Hawkins//September 1, 2015//
Civil
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and BAUER and MANION, Circuit Judges
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
No.13-3889 Israel Ramirez v. United States of America
Failure of counsel to presentence report characterization of appellant crimes and failure to timely request for certificate of appealability necessitates a reversal.
We agree with Ramirez that trial counsel’s performance was deficient. An attorney’s failure to object to an error in the court’s guidelines calculation that results in a longer sentence for the defendant can demonstrate constitutionally ineffective performance. See United States v. Jones, 635 F.3d 909, 916 (7th Cir. 2011). Ramirez points out that sentencing counsel believed at the time that Ramirez had the requisite convictions to make him a career offender. But by that time, Be‐ gay had been decided and counsel should have known that the two Texas convictions were suspect. See Begay, 553 U.S. at 141. Counsel also said that he unsuccessfully had tried to get the Texas records. He complained that he would have had to subpoena them from the Texas county in which Ramirez was convicted, and that this “would have been extremely difficult to do and time consuming.” This lack of desire to uncover the truth was deficient. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690 (1984); Wilson v. Mazzuca, 570 F.3d 490, 502 (2d Cir. 2009) (deficient performance includes errors arising from “oversight, carelessness, ineptitude, or laziness”). (Ramirez’s new counsel obtained the records with little difficulty, and they are now available to this court.)”
Vacated and remanded.