By: Derek Hawkins//August 26, 2015//
Criminal
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges
Jury Instruction
No. 14-2944 United States of America v. Lavelle Watts
Appellant attempted argument that he did not intend to harm officer trumped by in court video footage of appellant hurling a chair directly at officer and overwhelming evidence.
“Unsurprisingly in this video age, the entire incident in the courtroom was captured on video, leaving no possible doubt that the defendant was guilty of an offense punished in section 113(a)(3), namely assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to inflict bodily harm. The jury was properly instructed that it must not even consider the lesser offense punished in (a)(5) (but not defined in it, defined— incorrectly—only in the judge’s instructions) unless it decided to acquit the defendant of the greater offense. So having found the defendant guilty of (a)(3) it had no business considering (a)(5). The judge needn’t have given a “simple assault” instruction at all, because no reasonable jury could have acquitted the defendant of assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to inflict bodily harm yet convicted him of simple assault. United States v. McCullough, supra, 348 F.3d at 624–28.”
Affirmed