By: Derek Hawkins//July 28, 2015//
Criminal
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, FLAUM, Circuit Judge, and KENNELLY, District Judge.
Personal Jurisdiction
No. 14-3105 Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd v. Barbara Crabb
No. 14-3013 USA v. Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd
Appellant fails to meet criteria to have collateral order appealed.
“We raised this problem at oral argument, where Sinovel conceded that the rules applying to foreign sovereigns are not (at least technically) applicable to it. It argued instead that China’s stake in Sinovel warrants at least “a thumb on the scale” in favor of appellate jurisdiction over the district court’s denial of the motion to quash. But Sinovel has pointed to no rule to that effect. It cites Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305 (2010), in support of its argument that the FSIA’s language does not necessarily exclude entities it does not mention from its protections. Samantar, however, dealt with the question whether a foreign official could invoke the protections of the FSIA and thereby obtain immunity from suit. No, the Court replied: the term “foreign state” is defined in the statute, and officials are not mentioned. Id. at 315–16. It reached that result despite the fact that it recognized some residual federal common law of foreign sovereign immunity. Id. at 324. If Samantar helps anyone, it helps the government in this case, not Sinovel. We see no reason why a foreign corporation in which a foreign government has a minority stake is entitled to a “thumb on the scale” for jurisdictional purposes”
Dismissed and Denied