Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Administrative Law – public housing

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 7, 2015//

Administrative Law – public housing

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 7, 2015//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Administrative Law – public housing

Appellant Marian Ross appeals the circuit court’s order affirming a decision of the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee.[1] The Housing Authority terminated Ross from the Section Eight Housing Choice Voucher Program because her nephew, a lifetime registered sex offender, was living with her in violation of program rules. Ross contends that: (1) the Housing Authority’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence because she testified that her nephew did not live with her and the evidence to the contrary was hearsay; (2) the Housing Authority’s decision was arbitrary, unreasonable and represented its will, not its judgment; (3) the Housing Authority improperly switched the burden of proof to her; and (4) the Housing Authority terminated her from the program for an improper reason. We affirm.

DISTRICT I; Milwaukee; CHRISTOPHER R. FOLEY, Curley, P.J., Kessler, J. and Thomas Cane

2014AP001217 Marian Ross v. Milwaukee City Housing Authority

Full Text

 

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests