Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Search and Seizure – warrantless genital swabs – consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 27, 2015//

Search and Seizure – warrantless genital swabs – consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 27, 2015//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Search and Seizure – warrantless genital swabs – consent

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: MARC A. HAMMER, Judge. Affirmed.

Terrence Thomas appeals a judgment convicting him of repeated sexual assault of the same child and an order denying postconviction relief. Thomas argues his trial attorney was ineffective by failing to move to suppress DNA evidence obtained from warrantless swabs of Thomas’s genitals. He asserts the DNA evidence should have been suppressed because the genital swabs did not fall within any recognized exception to the warrant requirement. He also argues that, even if a warrant was not required, the swabs were nevertheless unreasonable because there was no clear indication they would produce evidence that he sexually assaulted the victim, and because they were not performed by a medical professional. Alternatively, Thomas argues the erroneous admission of the DNA evidence entitles him to a new trial in the interest of justice.

DISTRICT III; Brown County; MARC A. HAMMER; Hoover, P.J., Stark, Hruz, JJ.

2014AP000478-CR State v. Terrence L. Thomas

Full Text

 

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests