Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 18, 2014//

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 18, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal

Stephanie M. Przytarski appeals the judgment finding her guilty of non-summary criminal contempt, see Wis. Stat. §§ 785.03(1)(b) & 785.04(2)(a), and the order denying her motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether she has shown a post-sentence “manifest injustice” that would allow her to withdraw her guilty plea to non-summary criminal contempt. See State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707, 710 (1997) (“After sentencing, a defendant who seeks to withdraw a guilty or no contest plea carries the heavy burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.”). We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2014AP1019-CR In re: the findings of contempt: State v. Przytarski

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Flanagan, J., Fine, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Holevoet, John, Madison; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Torbenson, Matthew, Milwaukee

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests