Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Property – easements — reformation

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 4, 2014//

Property – easements — reformation

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 4, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Property – easements — reformation

The circuit court did not err in relying on extrinsic evidence of intent to reform an easement.

“We conclude the circuit court properly exercised its equitable authority when it reformed the Declaration. It is only necessary that the instrument describe the easement location with ‘reasonable certainty.’ See Wiegand v. Gissal, 28 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 137 N.W.2d 412 (1965). The Declaration does so, and the extrinsic evidence relied on by the circuit court has an adequate foundation in the Declaration’s language. Further, the evidence at trial was sufficient to establish mutual mistake. We therefore affirm.”

Affirmed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP2762 Prezioso v. Aerts

Dist. III, Forest County, Stenz, J., Cane, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kirschling, Michael J., De Pere; Stellpflug, C. D., De Pere; Peterson, Christina L., De Pere; For Respondent: Olk, Richard M., Antigo; Rhode, John B., Antigo

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests