Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — prosecutorial misconduct

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 4, 2014//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — prosecutorial misconduct

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 4, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — prosecutorial misconduct

Ryan P. O’Boyle appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of attempted second-degree intentional homicide with the use of a dangerous weapon. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.05(1), 939.32 & 939.63(1)(b). He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief. O’Boyle argues that: (1) the trial court erred when it denied without a hearing his claim that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation; (2) the police did not comply with proper photo array procedures when the victim identified O’Boyle as having stabbed him; (3) the prosecutor made improper statements during closing argument; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay evidence; and (5) the State improperly amended the charges. We affirm. Publication in the official reports is not recommended.

2014AP80-CR State v. O’Boyle

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cimpl, Yahamiro, JJ., Fine, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kay, Timothy T., Brookfield; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Pray, Eileen W., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests