By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 14, 2014//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Sentencing — discretion
In these consolidated appeals, Vincent Earl Daniels appeals from two judgments convicting him of identity theft contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.201(2)(a) (2011–12), and from orders denying his motion for resentencing. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court failed to adequately explain its reasons for the sentence it imposed. We affirm. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5.
2014AP556-CR, 2015AP557-CR State v. Daniels
Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, Brash, JJ., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Roemaat, Sara Heinemann, Waukesha; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Murphy, Anne Christenson, Madison