Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — discretion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 14, 2014//

Sentencing — discretion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 14, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — discretion

In these consolidated appeals, Vincent Earl Daniels appeals from two judgments convicting him of identity theft contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.201(2)(a) (2011–12), and from orders denying his motion for resentencing. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court failed to adequately explain its reasons for the sentence it imposed. We affirm. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5.

2014AP556-CR, 2015AP557-CR State v. Daniels

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, Brash, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Roemaat, Sara Heinemann, Waukesha; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Murphy, Anne Christenson, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests