Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Motor Vehicles – OWI — reasonable suspicion — implied consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 25, 2014//

Motor Vehicles – OWI — reasonable suspicion — implied consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 25, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Motor Vehicles – OWI — reasonable suspicion — implied consent

Steven Seward appeals the judgment finding him guilty of operating while intoxicated and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and 346.63(1)(b). Seward argues that the circuit court erred in: (1) finding that the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop; and (2) finding that the officer complied with the implied consent law, and affording the City the evidentiary benefits of automatic admissibility and the statutory presumption of intoxication. I conclude that the circuit court did not err in finding that the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop and in finding that the officer complied with the implied consent law. Accordingly, I affirm the judgment. This opinion will not be published.

2014AP735 City of Tomah v. Seward

Dist IV, Monroe County, Rice, J., Kloppenburg, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Holevoet, John, Madison; For Respondent: Precour-Berry, Penny Jean, Tomah

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests