Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure – Ineffective assistance – new trials

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 26, 2014//

Criminal Procedure – Ineffective assistance – new trials

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 26, 2014//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure – Ineffective assistance – new trials

Robert Kentrell Gant appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. See WIS. STAT. § 940.01(1)(a). He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief. He argues here that: (1) the trial court erred when it denied without hearing his claim that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation; (2) State witness Ashlee Bell’s recantation after his conviction was newly-discovered evidence; and (3) the real controversy was not tried. We affirm.

Affirmed.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP1842-CR State v. Gant

Dist. I, Milwaukee County, Martens, Wagner, JJ., Fine, J.

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests