Motor Vehicles – OWI – sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 29, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Motor Vehicles – OWI – sufficiency of the evidence

Richard S. Rohde appeals from an amended judgment of conviction for causing great bodily harm by the intoxicated use of a motor vehicle and for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, causing injury, second or subsequent offense. Rohde challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him and argues that the trial court, as fact-finder, failed to consider his affirmative defense. Alternatively, he seeks a new trial in the interest of justice arguing that the real controversy was not fully tried. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1700-CR State v. Rohde

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Loeb, Basil M., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; O’Brien, Daniel J., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event