Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Theft — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 29, 2014//

Theft — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 29, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Theft — sufficiency of the evidence

Terrence L. Johnson, pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdicts, on 13 various counts. Johnson also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Johnson claims there was insufficient evidence supporting seven of his convictions and that the State lacked jurisdiction over five other offenses. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order. This opinion shall not be published.

2013AP1429-CR State v. Johnson

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Hansher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Johnson, Terrence L., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Wellman, Sally L., Madison; Weber, Gregory M., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests