Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility – Public reprimand

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 1, 2014//

Professional Responsibility – Public reprimand

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 1, 2014//

Listen to this article

Professional Responsibility – Public reprimand

Where attorney Patrick J. Hudec engaged in a pattern of inattention to details, a public reprimand is appropriate.

“There is no showing that any of the referee’s findings of fact are erroneous. Accordingly, we adopt them. We also agree with the referee’s conclusions of law that Attorney Hudec violated the supreme court rules set forth above. We further agree with the referee that a public reprimand is an appropriate sanction for the misconduct at issue here. Finally, we agree with the referee that Attorney Hudec should be required to pay the full costs of the proceeding, which are $1,625.14.”

2013AP360-D OLR v. Hudec

Per Curiam.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests