Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 24, 2014//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 24, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Clarence Christopher Joseph appeals an order denying his postconviction motion brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06. Joseph argues that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance from his trial lawyer because his lawyer should have called a third-party eyewitness to testify at his trial. Joseph also argues that his lawyer should have objected to the prosecutor’s factual errors and improper argument during closing argument. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1703 State v. Joseph

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Borowski, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Marion, Colleen, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; O’Brien, Daniel J., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests