Insurance — duty to defend — intentional acts exclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 17, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Insurance — duty to defend — intentional acts exclusion

Basil E. Ryan, Jr., d/b/a Ryan Management Inc., Basil E. Ryan, Jr., individually, Basil E. Ryan, III, and Blake Ryan (collectively, the Ryans) appeal a declaratory and summary judgment in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company. The circuit court concluded that American Family had no duty to defend the Ryans against claims alleged in a civil complaint filed by Pumpkin, Inc., Glen Roethle, and Susan Joy Roethle. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1320 Pumpkin Inc. et al. v. Ryan et al.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Foley, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Tornehl, Walter T., Milwaukee; La Fleur, Catherine A., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Mingo, Mark J., Milwaukee

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event