Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly-discovered evidence — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 17, 2014//

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly-discovered evidence — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 17, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly-discovered evidence — ineffective assistance

Jesse J. Franklin, Jr. appeals the judgment convicting him of one count of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, one count of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(h)2., 961.41(1m)(cm)3., and 941.29(2)(a) (2003-04). He also appeals the order denying his second postconviction motion, made pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06. On appeal, Franklin argues that he should be granted a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence, or, in the alternative, on the basis that trial counsel was ineffective. We disagree and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP1447 State v. Franklin

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Sosnay, Dugan, JJ., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Cotter, Steven Patrick, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Whelan, Maura F.J., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests