By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 6, 2014//
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Civil
Professional Responsibility – suspension
Attorney was the subject of a separate disciplinary proceeding wherein he was suspended for 60 days. The court agrees with the referee that, since the misconduct here could have been included in the complaint in the previously filed disciplinary proceeding against Attorney Osicka, Case No. 2012AP60-D, the proper level of discipline to be imposed is a 60-day suspension that is concurrent with the suspension imposed in that case. The instant case alleges Osicka practiced law when his license previously was suspended, failed to notify clients that he was suspended, and failed to cooperate with the OLR. Since Attorney Osicka initially disputed some portions of the OLR’s complaint and the stipulation he entered was only partial in nature, we require Attorney Osicka to pay the full costs of this proceeding.
Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Complainant: Spoke, Julie Marie, Madison; For Respondent: Osicka, Timothy, Schofield