Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Immigration — removal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 17, 2014//

Immigration — removal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 17, 2014//

Listen to this article

U.S. Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Immigration — removal

Where an alien’s true identity is unknown, his petition for review of a removal order must be denied.

“Our inability to ascertain Singh’s identity dooms his petition for review of an order finding him removable from the United States. Singh claims that the Board of Immigration Appeals erred in concluding that he received constitutionally adequate notice of his immigration proceedings during his detention by Immigration and Naturalization Services officers in 1997.1 He also argues that the Board erred in finding that he could not establish inspection and admission into the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). Singh’s due process claims hinge on establishing that he really is Tarsem Singh and was just fifteen years old when he was detained by the INS in 1997, which he is unable to do. Singh also cannot establish by clear and convincing evidence that he was inspected and admitted into the United States when he entered this country. We therefore deny his petition for review.”

Petition Denied.

13-2552 Singh v. Holder

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Hamilton, J.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests