Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Tax — claim preclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 27, 2014//

Tax — claim preclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 27, 2014//

Listen to this article

U.S. Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Tax — claim preclusion

A decision in a prior action that an ERISA plan did not terminate bars a subsequent action alleging that the plan did terminate.

“In Carter I, we concluded that the Plan did not terminate. Appellants possessed—and exercised—a full and fair opportunity in Carter I to litigate the issue it seeks to have adjudicated in the Tax Court: specifically, whether the Plan terminated. However, appellants’ unsuccessful action in Carter I collaterally estops the Tax Court from making that determination. Appellants are precluded from re-litigating the issue of whether the Plan terminated.”

Affirmed.

13-2822 Carter v. CIR

Appeal from the United States Tax Court, Manion, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests