Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Family – post-divorce motions
Larry Anderson, pro se, appeals from an oral ruling in which the circuit court denied several of his post-divorce motions. However, Mr. Anderson fails to present any comprehensible appellate arguments. Accordingly, we grant Cindy Anderson’s motion for costs, court fees, and attorney fees incurred for responding to a frivolous appeal. Because Mr. Anderson has repeatedly used the judicial system to make vague, malicious, and unsupported accusations against virtually every person involved in his divorce action — including the circuit court judge and numerous attorneys — we also deem it appropriate to limit Mr. Anderson’s access to the courts until those costs, court fees, and attorney fees have been paid. We remand to the circuit court for a determination of the amount of costs, fees, and attorney fees to which Ms. Anderson is entitled. This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Brown County, Kelley, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Anderson, Larry David, pro se; For Respondent: Loomis, Robert B., Appleton