Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Property — adverse possession

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 3, 2013//

Property — adverse possession

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 3, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Property — adverse possession — acquiescence

Kenneth Schick appeals a judgment declaring interest in land. Schick and Valley Beau Farms, Inc., dispute the location of the boundary line between their adjoining farmland properties, both of which are described, primarily, by township quarter-section. Years after the parties obtained their respective parcels, the county moved a quarter-section corner monument, thus moving the location of the parties’ boundary line a respective distance away from the fence line that previously marked the boundary. Schick argues, under various adverse possession and acquiescence theories, that he should retain title to that portion of land between the fence line and the newly established boundary line. We reject Schick’s arguments, and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP623 Valley Beau Farms Inc. v. Schick

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Lenz, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Moore, Terry, Eau Claire; Finn, Stephanie L., Eau Claire; For Respondent: Bushman, Molly K., Chippewa Falls

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests