Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Labor — Act 10

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 20, 2013//

Labor — Act 10

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 20, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Labor — Act 10 — retroactivity

Act does not retroactively invalidate piggybacked CBAs that were freely and voluntarily entered into by governmental entities and public sector unions before the acts took effect.

“We find in Acts 10 and 32 no clear expression of the intention to retroactively upend the settled expectations of piggybacked CBAs that were negotiated and agreed upon months before those acts took effect.  To the contrary, the acts disclaim any such intention by exempting employees ‘covered by’ already-existing CBAs until after those CBAs end or are modified.”

“As for the legislature’s decision to make Act 32’s fiscal constraints upon municipalities effective immediately while postponing the acts’ collective bargaining limits until preexisting CBAs expire, as inequitable as this result might seem to some observers, it is not for this court to remedy. ‘The statute in question may be inequitable, but this does not make it absurd.’ Mellen Lumber Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 154 Wis. 114, 119, 142 N.W. 187 (1913).”

Affirmed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP290 Local 321 v. City of Racine

 

Dist. II, Racine County, Ptacek, J., Brown, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Olson, Mark L., Waukesha; Aziere, Joel S., Waukesha; Devore, Sarrie Lynn, Waukesha; For Respondent: Hawks, Timothy E., Milwaukee; Halstead, Aaron N., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests