Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Torts — governmental immunity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 9, 2013//

Torts — governmental immunity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 9, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Torts — governmental immunity

A volunteer firefighter is entitled to public officer immunity, but he violated a ministerial duty by running a red light.

“We conclude that Burditt was acting within the scope of his employment when the collision occurred.  Accordingly, he is within the class of individuals that may be shielded by public officer immunity.”

“However, we further conclude that Burditt is not entitled to public officer immunity because his acts in proceeding through the red stop signal without an audible signal violated a clear ministerial duty.  He therefore falls within that exception to public officer immunity.  The “rules of the road” statutes codified at Chapter 346 of the Wisconsin Statutes required Burditt to stop at the red stop signal because his vehicle lacked an audible signal.  Because Burditt’s acts fall within the ministerial duty exception to public officer immunity, he is not shielded by immunity and summary judgment is not appropriate.”

Reversed and Remanded.

2011AP583 Brown v. Acuity

Bradley, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Prachthauser, Don, Milwaukee; Stachowiak, Keith R., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Grady, Lance S., Waukesha; Miller, Daniel K., Waukesha

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests