Wisconsin Court of Appeals
FIPOF — sufficiency of the evidence
Brian L. Jackson appeals the judgment convicting him of being a felon in possession of a firearm as a repeat offender. See Wis. Stat. §§ 941.29(2)(a) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10). He also appeals the orders denying his postconviction motion and supplemental postconviction motion. Jackson argues: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) several alleged errors, which were not objected to at trial, constituted plain error; (3) the real controversy was not tried; and (4) the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We reject his arguments and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Borowski, J., Curley, P.J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Stewart Martin, Trisha R., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Madison