Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence – Relevance – undue prejudice

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 3, 2013//

Evidence – Relevance – undue prejudice

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 3, 2013//

Listen to this article

Evidence – Relevance – undue prejudice

Ronald L. Miller appeals a judgment convicting him of battery by a prisoner and disorderly conduct, both as a repeater. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.20(1), 947.01 and 939.62(1)(a) (2011-12). He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Miller seeks either a new trial or resentencing. We reject his arguments and affirm.

Affirmed.

This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1632-CR State v. Miller

Dist. II, Walworth County, Carlson,, J., Per Curiam.

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests