Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 7, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 7, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Nathan Fisher appeals a judgment convicting him of party to the crime of armed robbery with use of force. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Fisher claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in several respects at the sentencing hearing. Irrespective of whether trial counsel performed deficiently, we conclude that Fisher was not prejudiced by any of counsel’s alleged failures. We therefore affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP558-CR State v. Fisher

Dist III, Marathon County, Howard, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Ruby, Cole Daniel, Baraboo; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Heimerman, Kenneth J., Wausau

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests