Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Criminal Procedure — self-representation — speedy trials

Criminal Procedure — self-representation — speedy trials

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — self-representation — speedy trials

Robert L. Tatum, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Tatum contends that the trial court erroneously: denied his right to self-representation, violated his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.10 (2009-10), and denied his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the trial court on all grounds. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2011AP2439-CR State v. Tatum

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Kessler, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Tatum, Robert L., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Noet, Nancy A., Madison

Leave a Comment