Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — self-representation — speedy trials

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 29, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — self-representation — speedy trials

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 29, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — self-representation — speedy trials

Robert L. Tatum, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Tatum contends that the trial court erroneously: denied his right to self-representation, violated his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.10 (2009-10), and denied his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the trial court on all grounds. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2011AP2439-CR State v. Tatum

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Kessler, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Tatum, Robert L., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Noet, Nancy A., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests