Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Robbery — threat of force — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 23, 2012//

Robbery — threat of force — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 23, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Robbery — threat of force — sufficiency of the evidence

Tony D. Walker, pro se, appeals judgments convicting him of four counts of armed robbery with threat of force and one count of fleeing an officer. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the complaint and information were invalid, that the jury was not properly instructed, that there was insufficient evidence to support two of the convictions, that the amended judgment of conviction ordering restitution is invalid, that the circuit court erred in assigning his bail to his trial attorney in payment of fees, and that the circuit court improperly refused to take judicial notice of some factual issues during the postconviction motion proceedings. We reject all of Walker’s arguments and affirm the judgments and order. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1491-CR, 2011AP1492-CR, 2011AP1493-CR State v. Walker

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Hansher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Walker, Tony D., pro se; For Respondent: Gansner, William L., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests