Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — Confrontation Clause

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 25, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — Confrontation Clause

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 25, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — Confrontation Clause

Kenneth Pringle, Jr., appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child, one count of second-degree sexual assault by use of force, and one count of false imprisonment. He argues that the circuit court violated his constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him when it allowed testimony at trial from a State Crime Lab DNA analyst who had not performed the DNA analysis done in his case. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2012-CR State v. Pringle

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Breffeilh, John Richard, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Moeller, Marguerite M., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests